The Cockroach Janata Party has 17 million social media followers after one week of existence. The BJP has governed India since 2014. The Congress is the principal opposition. On paper, comparing them is absurd — a satirical insect-themed party against two of the world’s most established political organisations. But if we judge each purely on what they have promised and delivered for India’s youth, the comparison becomes surprisingly instructive.
We scored each party across 6 key issues using a simple three-point scale: Strong (clear policy + delivery record), Partial (policy exists but delivery is weak or partial), or Absent (no substantive policy).
Issue 1: Graduate Unemployment
BJP: Promised 2 crore jobs/year in 2014. Delivered approximately 42 lakh formal jobs/year by CMIE’s measure — 21% of the promise. The PM Internship Scheme (2024) targets 1 lakh placements in Year 1. The BJP argues that infrastructure investment creates indirect employment; critics counter that this does not reach the graduate who needs a desk job in 2026. Rating: Partial.
Congress: The 2024 manifesto included a “Job Guarantee for Graduates” promising 30 lakh public sector positions. No implementation record since Congress is not in power. Previous UPA-era tenure saw better formal job creation metrics but also presided over the agrarian crisis and urban informal employment stagnation. Rating: Partial (on promise; no delivery record).
CJP: Proposes ₹15,000/month unemployment allowance for job-seeking graduates, funded by a 0.5% tax on large corporate profits. Specific mechanism, specific number. Has not governed and cannot be judged on delivery. Rating: Strong (on policy specificity; delivery unknown).
Issue 2: NEET and Exam Reform
BJP: The 2024 NEET paper leak occurred under the BJP-led NTA administration. The government’s response was to dissolve the NTA board and restructure the agency — an acknowledgement of failure that arrived 18 months after the leak. A new multi-exam model was announced but not yet implemented as of May 2026. Rating: Partial (reactive, delayed).
Congress: Vigorously opposed NEET in Parliament and led walkouts over the leak scandal. State Congress governments in Telangana and Karnataka have called for state-level medical entrance tests. However, the party created NEET in the first place during UPA-II (2013) — making its current opposition somewhat self-serving. Rating: Partial (opposition only; complicit in creation).
CJP: Calls for the abolition of the single-exam model, independent audit of all NTA examinations, criminal prosecution of officials linked to leaks, and decentralised state-level alternatives. The most comprehensive reform proposal of the three. Rating: Strong (policy clarity).
Issue 3: Student Debt and Education Loan Relief
BJP: The PM Vidyalakshmi scheme provides collateral-free loans of up to ₹7.5 lakh for higher education. The scheme does not address repayment relief for graduates who cannot find work. No income-contingent repayment mechanism exists. Rating: Partial.
Congress: Promised a complete waiver of education loans up to ₹10 lakh in its 2024 manifesto. No delivery record. Rating: Partial (promise only).
CJP: The manifesto does not explicitly address student loan reform in its 5 main points, though Abhijeet Dipke has discussed income-contingent repayment in interviews. Rating: Absent (from manifesto; discussed informally).
Issue 4: Youth Political Representation
BJP: The average age of BJP MPs elected in 2024 was 57. The party’s youth wing (BJYM) has historically been a feeder for party apparatchiks rather than a genuine pipeline to Parliament. No formal youth seat reservation proposal. Rating: Absent.
Congress: Has historically included more young MPs through its NSUI student wing and the Gandhi family’s own youth branding. Rahul Gandhi has championed “younger India” as a theme. However, no constitutional mechanism for youth seat reservation has been proposed. Rating: Partial (rhetoric without mechanism).
CJP: Demands a constitutional amendment reserving 20% of parliamentary and assembly seats for candidates under 35. Most radical and specific of the three. Rating: Strong.
Issue 5: Digital Rights and Online Harassment
BJP: The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023) passed under BJP establishes a data protection framework, though critics including EFF and Internet Freedom Foundation argue it gives government excessive surveillance power and insufficient individual rights. Rating: Partial (law exists; contested).
Congress: Opposed the DPDP Act as insufficient. No alternative framework detailed. Rating: Absent (opposition without alternative).
CJP: The manifesto does not include a standalone digital rights chapter, though Dipke has spoken about online harassment protections in the context of youth mental health. Rating: Absent (from manifesto).
Issue 6: Youth Mental Health
BJP: The National Mental Health Programme exists but receives less than 1% of India’s total health budget. The Manodarpan initiative during COVID was widely praised for its intent but underfunded in execution. Rating: Partial.
Congress: Has spoken about mental health in the context of student suicides during exam season, but has not produced a costed policy proposal. Rating: Absent (from manifesto).
CJP: Explicitly connects unemployment, dignity, and mental health in its manifesto preamble. Point 5 (against the stigmatisation of the unemployed) has a mental health dimension. Abhijeet Dipke has spoken about youth suicide and exam pressure in multiple media appearances. Rating: Partial (framing without specific funding mechanism).
The Scorecard
Across 6 issues, the rough scorecard looks like this:
- CJP: Strong×3, Partial×2, Absent×1 — highest on policy specificity; zero delivery record.
- BJP: Partial×4, Absent×2 — longest delivery record; significant gaps on core youth issues.
- Congress: Partial×3, Absent×3 — good promises; no national governance record in 12 years.
The obvious caveat: the CJP is a movement with no governance responsibility. It is easy to have bold policies when you don’t have to fund them. But the comparison is revealing in a different sense: it shows that the two parties that have actually governed India have, between them, left enough of the youth policy space unoccupied that a satirical cockroach party could credibly claim to have more specific proposals on three of India’s most urgent youth issues.
That, more than any meme or viral hashtag, may be the CJP’s most uncomfortable political contribution.
Related: CJP Manifesto 2026 — Full Breakdown | Youth Unemployment Data 2026 | What is the CJP?
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any political party or organisation. Readers are encouraged to independently verify all claims. Read our full Disclaimer · Terms & Conditions · Privacy Policy
